|
Isn't that pretty much what VALUE does? I realize there are some subtle
differences between "ALWAYS CONST" and "VALUE", but I can't see why
those differences would matter to you.
Jon Paris wrote:
What I mean by this is a form of CONST that _always_ takes a copy and
passes that. Right now it only produces a copy if there is a mismatch
between the parm passed and that expected. I'd like to be able to
guarantee that my data doesn't get changed no matter what happens in
the called routine.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.