Re: Why RNF5410 for undefined variable in prototype call?

[Simon Coulter <shc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 21/04/2010, at 9:39 AM, Rory Hewitt wrote:

> I just assumed that the underlying processing QCMDEXC was at least  
> as good
> as an RPG %trim, but perhaps not. I don't know what type of program  
> QCMDEXC
> is - it's surely not just a CL?

No it's not CL. It's (likely) PL/MI but the language hardly matters. I  
suspect that QCMDEXC doesn't do very much with the command but rather  
just passes it off to the normal Command Analyser code:

	QCMDEXC
	|-->QCADRV2
	    |-->QCANPARS
	    |-->QCARULE
	    |-->QCAPOS
	    |-->QCAFLD
	    X-->QCAATRS
	    X-->CPP for command specified on call to QCMDEXC

The X in the last two call stack entries indicates XCTL rather than  
CALLX.

Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
   FlyByNight Software         OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists

   http://www.flybynight.com.au/
   Phone: +61 2 6657 8251   Mobile: +61 0411 091 400        /"\
   Fax:   +61 2 6657 8251                                   \ /
                                                             X
                 ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail  / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------