Re: Multi-defined Fields: SQL Precompiler (Jerry Adams)

[James Perkins <jrperkinsjr@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for that link Chuck. It looks like they are gearing towards
some kind of XML integration. The "future" keyword that worries me the
most is "ID". I have several tables that use ID for a primary key that
is build as an IDENTITY field.

--
James R. Perkins



On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:50, CRPence <CRPbottle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Voris, John wrote:
> > Is "PROCESS" a reserved word in SQL ?
> >
> > > When I remove the $Process procedure, its prototype, and
> > > invocation, (no other changes) the program compiles.
>
>   FWiW: The token PROCESS is not a reserved SQL word\identifier, as
> of DB2 for IBM i 7.1:
> http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/iseries/v7r1m0/topic/db2/rbafzwordsre.htm
>
> Regards, Chuck
> --
> This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
> or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.