Could this not also be handled by creating a java array of connection objects, and then saving each instance of a connection object in that java array, as they are created?

In that way, you would not have to resort to trying to "fool" the compiler, and introduce code that could potentially "break" at some future release.

In other words, perhaps you are creating this array at the wrong architectural level, e.g. as an RPG IV array, versus a Java array object.

Those are my thoughts on this situation.

What do you all think?

All the best,

Mark S. Waterbury

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.