Typo:
AFAIK that should not be the problem if you compile the modules for the serviceprogram on the machine (or at a least a machine with the same ccsid) that will run the program, else it really is a problem.
-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schmidt, Mihael
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 7:39 AM
To: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i
Subject: RE: Future of RPG was: Open Access for RPG
AFAIK that should be the problem if you compile the modules for the serviceprogram on the machine (or at a least a machine with the same ccsid) that will run the program, else it really is a problem.
-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Aaron Bartell
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 8:27 PM
To: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i
Subject: Re: Future of RPG was: Open Access for RPG
I have had the same issue with RPGUI and it's use of { [ ] } for JSON
arrays - works great on many systems, but with some code pages it gets
translated incorrectly - and that is within compiled objects! (which
surprised me a bit)
I need to get around to asking Mihael to change it to be hex coded
into a constant or something.
Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com
http://mowyourlawn.com/blog/
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Birgitta Hauser
<Hauser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
while anybody else uses
if (abc != '123') {
in other languages
The answer may be quite easy, because neither ! nor { } nor || is
international or the same in all EBCDIC, ASCII, UNICODE schemas.
I've already problems with Release 7.1 when IBM introduced Arrays where
brackets [] are used.
If I want to create an array on my system I have to type:
CREATE TYPE MySchema/MyIntArr
AS INTEGER ARRAY ¬ 100 | ;
(instead of Array [100])
Nice, isn't it?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
midrange.com
