On 9/3/2010 3:59 AM, David FOXWELL wrote:
Working on a RPGIII that has just been converted to IV.
Need to test a field to see if its value is 'X0'.

So why not do this?

IF Field = 'X0';
//whatever
endif;

Or in the older RPGIII-like syntax:

C FIELD1 IFEQ 'X0'

I guess I don't understand why you'd use a constant like cX0. It provides no clarity to the code -- in fact, it just makes the code harder to read, because now you have to see what value cX0 contains... whereas if you compare to the literal 'X0', it's obvious.

You should only use constants where the name of the constant CLARIFIES it's meaning.

For example, you could change this:

If Field1 < 5;

To this:

If Field1 < MINIMUM_PRICE;


(or in RPGIII like syntax):

C FIELD1 IFLT MINPRC

You now know what the 5 meant... whereas before, you either had to guess, or look for comments/documentation that explained it. Naming the constant something like c5 wouldn't have clarified anything, and therefore would've been a waste of your time & the "next guy's" time.

The name of a variable/constant should never be a simple echo of it's value. That's pointless.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.