heh heh... You answered your own question, and you made the case for giving up the old style.

Why not try the code, just as you want it (except change the if to a when), and see if it works?

> WHEN *INKF AND (CONDITION1=FALSE OR CONDITION2=FALSE)


On 11/10/2010 3:09 AM, David FOXWELL wrote:
Consider this code :

C *INKF WHENEQ *ON
C CONDITION1 ANDEQ FALSE

*If I add :
C CONDITION2 OREQ FALSE


I think this now means :

IF (*INKF AND CONDITION1=FALSE) OR (CONDITION2=FALSE)

But I want :
IF *INKF AND (CONDITION1=FALSE OR CONDITION2=FALSE)

Which is right?

Thanks

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.