Re: AW: AW: Modules using NOMAIN, but not in a Service Program -- RPG400-L

Subject: Re: AW: AW: Modules using NOMAIN, but not in a Service Program
From: Barbara Morris <bmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:51:58 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 1/18/2011 3:03 AM, Birgitta Hauser wrote:

I'm confused what's wrong with PEP Module?

Birgitta, I don't think there's anything wrong with that term. For what it's worth, the term "PEP Module" is used in several places in the Info Center, in the same sense that you were using it. And to me, "PEP Module" seems completely equivalent to "Program Entry Procedure Module".

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.