I think your coworker is correct. Is this not how a service program
works?




David FOXWELL <David.FOXWELL@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
01/31/2011 07:55 AM
Please respond to
RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
recursive calls






Hi all

Today, by accident I set up a job where program tried to call itself. We
have one program that is duplicated in several libraries and LIBA/PGM
should have called LIBB/PGM. This was the first time I'd actually seen the
error produce in this way. A coworker informed me that recursive calls
were possible with subprocedures thanks to the fact that at each call, a
separate storage area is allocated for each subprocedure. This is not the
case for program calls. That means that if mySP calls mySP and there is a
local variable V1, there will be two adresses for V1, each containing a
different value.
I don't doubt my coworker, it's just that my reference is midrange.com.

Is my information accurate? What happens to static variables in such
subprocedure calls?

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.