Re: Socket Recv Question -- RPG400-L

Subject: Re: Socket Recv Question
From: Scott Klement <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:50:13 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Have you disabled Nagle's algorithm? That may be throwing off your benchmarks.

On 2/23/2011 2:31 PM, Zachary Johnson wrote:

Hi Scott, thanks for the reply. Yes, using SOCK_STREAM. I still
think it's odd though that the short request would take longer to
arrive on the socket than the large request. It's driving me up the
wall that I have no other explanation other than "that's how it
works". Thanks again for the response.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Socket Recv Question , Zachary Johnson

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.