Re: Calling similiar (overloaded) procedure that has *nopass *omit in the parameter -- RPG400-L

Subject: Re: Calling similiar (overloaded) procedure that has *nopass *omit in the parameter
From: Scott Klement <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 17:20:46 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 3/8/2011 5:03 PM, Rory Hewitt wrote:

This might be a stupid question, but does proc2 care how many parms were
passed, or does it just care about not using any unpassed ones?

That's pretty much what I asked 4 hours ago. Still haven't had a response.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.