Re: Embedded SQL - performance question -- RPG400-L

Subject: Re: Embedded SQL - performance question
From: Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 20:40:19 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 5/31/2011 5:04 PM, Pete Hall wrote:

My experience has been that if an appropriate index exists, performance
knocks your socks off. If not, well, it doesn't. SQL does not like
legacy indexes with include/exclude definitions either, so those won't
do you any good. Index advisor is your friend...

CHAIN outperforms FETCH with index.

Joe

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.