Correction...

A SELECT can and does lock records when it needs or is told to, but
most SELECTs are reads without lock.

READ and CHAIN also have the ability read the record without a lock...

HTH,
Charles



On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Åke Olsson <ake.olsson@xxxxxx> wrote:
A few things:

With SQL it is a lot easier to avoid record lock situations. (A SELECT does not lock a record).

You can update one field only w/o touching every field in a record.



Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards

Åke H Olsson
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.