Re: Open Explicit -vs- Open Implicit -- RPG400-L

Subject: Re: Open Explicit -vs- Open Implicit
From: Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:31:46 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Yes...

Thanks for the correction.

Charles

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Hiebert, Chris
<chris.hiebert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Since it's a file error, wouldn't an implicit open trigger the INFSR for
the file, not the PSSR?

Chris Hiebert

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.