Besides,
1 - Other than a customer issued edict like "print barcodes" so they
purchase TL Ashford's package, do people on older releases actually
purchase new software? For example, when was the last time you made a new
sale to someone running a version that was long out of support?
2 - Many existing customers want their vendors to come up with a policy of
only supporting releases currently supported by IBM. That would give them
a 'business' reason to upgrade their OS and maybe even their hardware. For
example, if a PC vendor announced they were going to stop supporting
Windows 3.1 and you had to have XP, 2008 or 7 and it meant that the person
could finally go to their manager and say "Hey Peachtree announced they
were going to drop Windows 3.1 and the new tax laws are coming out and if
we want support we have to upgrade our PC". How many managers would
really kick and scream and tell their accounting manager to shop for a new
package that still runs on 3.1?
3 - Would you rather please the small market of people who still run
obsolete hardware, or be able to take advantage of the larger pool of
people who still occasionally write checks for IT department purchases?

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.