Paul Jones: Running in a separate job is basically what it's doing now with QCMDEXC/RUNJVA, and what I was hoping to get away from.
CRPence: The QCMDEXC/RUNJVA is what I'm doing now. JNI is what I'm trying to do. Am I incorrect that JNI would perform better? I believed (potentially incorrectly) that QCMDEXC/RUNJVA would start a new JVM everytime, while JNI would reuse the JVM.
Scott Klement: I can't "look behind the curtain" of the Java app, I'm just trying to go off what I see in my joblogs. I have a DIY Java server written in RPG that uses data queues. That was my final goal for this, but that won't work if it kills my JVM.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
