|
I just finished the Externalizing I/O section, and I'm not really sure
it helps with the "hack the DB one more time" mentioned at the start.
We're just finishing up what I imagine is a typical DB change issue.
We have a table with several columns that need to be lengthened. The
table is used in 800-900 programs, some still using I-specs. We of
course had no practical choice but to add new columns at the end and orphan the old ones.
The sample app exposes (via EXPORT/IMPORT) data structures defined off
PF record formats. How does that help with DB changes? If you change
the table and service program, the service program will be exposing a
different layout of the DS than calling programs expect which will cause errors.
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries)
(RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.