Performance impact of unused prototyped functions/procedures -- RPG400-L

Subject: Performance impact of unused prototyped functions/procedures
From: Mitch Gallman <mgallman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 22:05:08 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "RPG programming on the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I have a service program with many exported functions/procedures and I have a copybook with all the prototypes (no /if defined declarations).
If my program only uses one function from all the prototypes that were included...does having the extra prototyped functions that are never used impact startup performance of my program?

Thanks!
Mitch Gallman

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Performance impact of unused prototyped functions/procedures , Birgitta Hauser
Re: Performance impact of unused prototyped functions/procedures , Buck Calabro
Re: Performance impact of unused prototyped functions/procedures , Charles Wilt
Re: Performance impact of unused prototyped functions/procedures , Jon Paris

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.