|
This... to me feels like copy-pasting code. And the more different
d_shift values you have to support, the worse this becomes.
I do suspect this *might* be the best-performing approach. Even if it
is, I don't think the performance gains are worth the verbosification
(and calcification) of the code.
So are you saying that you would NOT like to see a service
procedure similar to the following [SELECT with 15 WHEN branches,
plus fallback] to accomplish this?
Correct. I would have rather seen the string processing logic as the
guts of the service procedure.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.