Re: EXPORTing procedures -- RPG400-L

Subject: Re: EXPORTing procedures
From: Scott Klement <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 15:24:51 -0600
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Nah. Can't be "spot on", I never get things right the first time, haha.

I think its a bug. Its easy to work around by moving the prototype out of Proc1, or eliminating the prototype entirely (what's the point of a prototype for a procedure with no PI that's in the same module?) but... its probably a bug and should be reported to IBM.

On 11/12/2020 3:10 PM, Mark Waterbury wrote:

IIRC, some of this behavior was changed recently, e.g. with recent TR levels, for at least 7.3 and 7.4 ... so, your idea of "missing PTFs" may be "spot on"? :-)

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.