"mlazarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <mlazarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The original poster (Shalom) was suggesting that ...
<snip>
there is a possible security hole. 

I agree that this isn't a "hole". I think it comes down to the definition.

I.e., is the existence of *ALLOBJ a hole? Of course it isn't. However, if there 
was no way to prevent access to *ALLOBJ, then a hole would exist.

In this case, there is a set of actions that can take place that cause 
inaccurate info to be recorded. It is possible to cause a journal to record 
that one user created a value, when in fact the value was created by a 
different user.

But because it's possible to prevent that by proper application of known 
security principles, it isn't a "hole".

Nevertheless, this is fairly a novel idea and is well worth being made known to 
everyone. It clearly demonstrates that proper precautions must be taken. It 
provides a textbook example of why, for example, debug access to production 
tasks is a serious issue. The discussion illustrates for everyone who is 
learning from this list why the related precautionary guidelines exist.

Tom Liotta


This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.