|
Joe, I think I understand. I'll try to find the right person/people to get your input to. Thanks for your patience explaining this! Phil Coulthard, STSM, iSeries AD, IBM Canada Ltd. coulthar@xxxxxxxxxxx 905-413-4076, t/l 969-4076 ----- Forwarded by Phil Coulthard/Toronto/IBM on 05/30/2003 10:45 AM ----- |---------+----------------------------> | | "Joe Pluta" | | | <joepluta@xxxxxxx| | | others.com> | | | Sent by: | | | wdsci-l-bounces@x| | | idrange.com | | | | | | | | | 05/29/2003 11:21 | | | PM | | | Please respond to| | | Websphere | | | Development | | | Studio Client for| | | iSeries | |---------+----------------------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: "Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries" <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> | | cc: | | Subject: RE: [WDSCI-L] EARs and Jars continued | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > From: Phil Coulthard > > Joe, I might be missing something here, but if you don't want to include > the jars in the ear, then > its ok, it just means you are ready, willing and able to handle getting > those jars into the production > server, which it sounds like you are. In the ear, gets published. Out of > ear, not published. Yes, Phil, I've so far been unable to communicate my point. I'll try again. Let's say that I have a typical real world application development environment with dozens of projects. These have their own projects and are distributed as EAR files. However, they all share common JAR files - like JTOpen, or the Xerces parser, or a PDF creation jar, or any of the hundreds of JAR files out there that make Java development so wonderful. In this environment, I probably don't want to have to have dozens of copies of JAR files in individual project folders. These should truly be shared, external JAR files - probably on a central network drive where they can be easily maintained and updated. However, when I package a project for delivery, I may want to include one or more of those JAR files (in fact, due to rather simplistic deployment mechanism J2EE uses, I probably have to do this). With WDSC, I have to have copies of all those JAR files locally in every one of my enterprise applications. This is a dubious practice, if nothing else from a maintenance standpoint - every time I get a new version of a JAR file, I have to go through every project and update it. Not the best development environment. Instead, I would like the option to have the EAR packager automatically include selected external files AS IF they were located locally on my hard drive. This is not an unreasonable request - in fact, it would bring the J2EE model a little closer to something usable for enterprise-level development. Now, if I were to design the installation process, I'd go a step further. I'd allow the package developer to specify which JARs are required, and then the tool would include them in the JAR. At deployment time, the install process would determine whether each of those JAR files are available on the production server and if so, to use the existing JAR, and if not, would use the file included in the EAR. But that would require effort beyond simply decompressing a ZIP file, and thus I fear unlikely to appear in the J2EE specification which is, after all, merely a specification, not an implementation standard. Although that particular nuance seems to be overlooked quite often these days. > So, to do this, just set your project's build path to put directly to the > jar files where they live on your > disk, as did before I think. Then, to get Run On Server to work, you have > to set the ws.ext.dirs > classpath, which can be set for each server via the Path tab in the server > configuration editor. > That'll handle compiling in the IDE, and running in the IDE. For > running on > the server you deploy > to, you'll just have to set this ws.ext.dirs classpath yourself. If you want this tool to be widely successful for enterprise application devlopment, you may want to have a more automated deployment mechanism. Any manual step in the process introduces an error factor that might well be unacceptable in a production environment. "Remember to set set this switch here after installing" works fine for software that changes only rarely and where you can afford someone whose job it is to keep track of arcane configuration files. Things like mail servers come to mind here. But in a mission critical application environment where software changes are applied on a daily basis under extreme time pressures, making sure your programmers tweak the right switch is often impossible. Just an observation. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.