Re: RSE performance against very large source files -- WDSCI-L

Subject: Re: RSE performance against very large source files
From: "Dave Shaw" <daveshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:07:53 +0000
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l>
List-help: <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries <wdsci-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:wdsci-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l>, <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l>, <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Eric,

You may be right, but I think they have the box maxed on memory, and convincing the powers that be to shift memory from production to development is probably not within my ability. If that turns out to be the problem, we're probably stuck with it for a while. Sigh.

Dave Shaw
Mohawk Industries

----- Original Message -----
From: "DeLong, Eric" <EDeLong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries" <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] RSE performance against very large source files

2.5 GB memory on an 890 sounds kinda small.... I know you said this was an lpar, but depending on the size of the lpar, I would think you would need more than 2.5GB.

Eric

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.