|
I would concur with most of Joe's opinions. I'm fully sold on WDSc
and I'm certain I will be on RDi. However, there are functions which
fall in my responsibility as a senior analyst which I can't do in the
workbench (a generic term to make this simple). For example, at times
I produce lists of objects or source members with WRKOBJPDM. I use
these as a checklist for a project--e.g., upgrades of purchased
applications, changes in business rules, etc. WDSc (and I'm assuming
RDi) don't print lists from the table view, the RSE-tree view, iSeries
search view, etc. Until such time, I'll *need* an ADTS license to doto do my development in SEU.
my job--I can't do my job without it. But I emphatically don't want
And you know what? Until we started talknig about getting rid of ADTS,
I think there's no argument that editing is better in the workbench,So start entering problem reports, DCRs, whatever you can in order to
but the workbench hasn't replaced all the functions of
PDM--particularly the WRKxxxPDM functions. (Just to be clear, I like
some of the features of the table view or a filter better--e.g.,
member lists crossing multiple source files, etc.)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.