RDi Entitlements

[Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> John Taylor wrote:
> Changing the name and claiming it is a new product is
> disingenuous to say the least. Personally, I think it's highly
> unethical, and should be considered criminal.

Joe will probably answer for himself, but it appears to me that his 
opinion and your opinion are not far apart.  Joe has especially been 
vocal about IBM needing to allow SWMA customers to apply their 
entitlements to RDi, as an alternative to ADTS.  And he expects IBM to 
announce such a plan in April.

IBM's bundling practices of the past are catching up with them now, in 
customer ill-will, but at least IBM is moving away from that practice. 
With separately packaged and priced products, you'll know better what 
you're paying for.  And so will IBM.

Nathan.