Re: Is RDi really a "new" product?

["Dean, Robert" <rdean@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Amen to that.  Given the lack of Kerberos support in the System i personality, and the fact that JGSS isn't all that hard to cope with, I'd probably take a stab at adding Kerberos/EIM enablement to the security model.

-----Original Message-----
From: wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of David Gibbs
Sent: Thu 3/6/2008 2:53 PM
To: Websphere Development Studio Client for iSeries
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Is RDi really a "new" product?
 
Joe Pluta wrote:
> Do you need this for development?  Since WDSC already has RSE, why would 
> you want the OpenRSE plug-in?

Um, wasn't OpenRSE was initiated by WDSC requirements.  As far as I 
know, this is where RSE is going no mater what.  IBM will still bolt 
things on top of OpenRSE, but the core RSE will be open.

Unless I'm missing something.

Personally, as a RSE plug-in developer, I look forward to having the RSE 
open sourced.

david