Re: Program verifier -- WDSCI-L

Subject: Re: Program verifier
From: Dave Shaw <daveshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l>
List-help: <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries <wdsci-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:wdsci-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l>, <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l>, <mailto:wdsci-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I mostly use the verifier, too, although running WDSCi while using some of the
6.1 enhancements is growing annoying. Since the performance of our dev system
is pretty erratic, I continue to prefer the verifier anyway. If I could just
convince someone to shell out for an RDP seat...

Dave Shaw
Mohawk Industries

----- Original Message ----
From: "Rick.Chevalier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Rick.Chevalier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mon, June 25, 2012 9:24:54 AM
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Program verifier

From reading the other posts I must be the odd man out. I use verify a lot.
For me it is quick and accurate. Using the verifier is my preferred method of
identifying and eliminating coding errors. Once I have the errors taken care
of, then I compile.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Program verifier , Gary Thompson

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.