Re: To be under Indicators or not to be

[Barbara Morris <bmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2012/10/1 3:30 PM, Daron Whitehouse wrote:
> The following snippet is a mapped named indicator example (there are other methods):
>        //  named indicators
>       D p_Indicators    S               *   Inz(%Addr(*In))
>       D indicators      DS                  Based(p_Indicators)
>       D  In01thru65                   65A   Overlay(indicators)
>       D  inputUL                       1N   Overlay(indicators: *Next)

Daron, your indicators DS isn't necessarily always mapped to the *IN 
indicators. Your p_Indicators pointer could be set to point to some 
other storage.

Any human can tell that the "indicators" DS is mapped over *IN, but it's 
not _officially_ mapped over *IN.

So unfortunately, the concept of a mapped named indicator doesn't really 
exist.