I have seen folks do this thinking that the "keep alive" time would then be
increased - reading the help is over-rated? ;)
Mike
Mike Hockings, M.Eng., P.Eng.
DevOps for Enterprise
IBM Developer for z Systems and Power Systems Software Technical Support
IBM Canada Ltd. Laboratory
hockings@xxxxxxxxxx
From: Dan <dan27649@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries" <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2018/06/04 23:52
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Timeout Errors
Sent by: "WDSCI-L" <wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
I've experienced similar issues wrt the OP. So, I checked the link, and
prompted CHGTCPA on our dev box. It is currently set to 1000. According
to the linked answer, the IBM i default is 120. So, if true, I wonder why
someone made the decision to change it to 1000. I can't imagine why. It
seems to me to be akin to not doing a keepalive at all.
On a more practical note in our dev environment, is there a potential for
any negative effects by setting this to 15, per the linked answer's
suggestion?
- Dan
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 9:01 AM, Mike Hockings <hockings@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If the time-out happens after the RSE connection has been left idling for
a
while you may wish to review this...
https://developer.ibm.com/answers/questions/288843/how-
to-prevent-the-rse-connection-from-dropping-wh/
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at
https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l
.
midrange.com
