Edmund,
Yes, you should be paying Buck!
I do not want other users to run into the same pain that I have with RDI.
I did an Alt+S to split the screen. And RDI wipe out my code. I did it several times to be sure.
https://imgur.com/a/OaJcxt2
Sorry, a shaky video, wish I had a tripod. Alt+S to "Split-Line" and then did Ctrl+Z to put it back. Oh well, it happens...
My Microsoft Co-Workers were laughing, that I have to use ALT+S to split-line. What is wrong with Enter to split a line. I said that is NOT how RDI works on Exec SQL lines. Oh well.
Disenable parsing, and then I was able to continue coding.
-Ken Killian-
-----Original Message-----
From: WDSCI-L <wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Edmund Reinhardt
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 1:05 PM
To: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx; kc2hiz@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Officially the weirdest thing I've seen in RDi
Excellent explanation Buck, we should be paying you :-)
----- Original message -----
From: Paul Therrien <paultherrien@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: "WDSCI-L" <wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client
for System i & iSeries <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] Officially the weirdest thing I've seen in RDi
Date: Fri, Aug 17, 2018 9:19 AM
+1 ... for your patient tutoring.
(although, I still have not tried to implement iProjects)
Paul
On 2018-08-17 08:51, Buck Calabro wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 07:49, Ken Killian <kkillian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
>> Sadly, I have used iProjects. And it has burned me....
>
> Ken, your note is like a time machine of my life. I can very much
> imagine myself writing this exact thing 20 years ago - I might even
> have done, for all I know. My current self is different to that
> earlier self, and I'd like to take the opportunity to write a note,
> put it in the TARDIS, and deliver it to my past self so I could... get
> past this block. Here is my message in a Klein Bottle:
>
> Younger Buck,
> It happened again. You've use iProjects to group all the source
> members for a particular mod in one place, pushed it to production,
> and the debugger insists on referring to the old source in the
> iProject. That frustrates the heck out of you and you've sworn off
> iProjects as the crappiest crap ever put into IBM software.
>
> Don't be so hasty. There's nothing wrong with iProjects - the problem
> is you. Wait, don't stop reading yet. This is your older, wiser self
> here - you best take my advice. I'm going to need you to be smarter
> Real Soon Now. But I can't talk about that - spoilers! Yes, I still
> ramble. I'm working on it. It turns out that you're going to need
> iProjects for... argh. Yes, spoilers.
>
> The problem with iProjects isn't the tool - it's how you're using it.
> You are right-handed. You can cut with left-handed scissors, but it
> won't turn out well. You'll have deja vu when you learn that lesson
> yourself. iProjects is designed to be a semi-permanent container for
> your source. It was a good idea to use iProjects to keep track of all
> the things for the ZIP code expansion project! It was a bad idea to
> assume that the iProject disappeared when you uploaded the source back
> to production. Let me say that again, with different words, because
> we're still stubborn 20 years later - You can't have the iProject AND
> the production code in the IDE at the same time. Once more, with
> feeling: If the iProject is done, the source uploaded, iProject not
> needed any more, DELETE THE iPROJECT.
>
> Rule Zero: As long as the iProject is in the IDE, the iProject IS THE
> CANONICAL, OFFICIAL SOURCE OF RECORD. Edit iProjects, or edit
> production. NEVER, EVER, CROSS THE STREAMS!
> Yes, I'm yelling. We haven't got over that either. Working on that,
too.
>
> If there's some reason you need to keep the iProject around (like
> having to deploy it on multiple LPARs / customer machines) then under
> no circumstances should you ever change the code on the IBM side -
> change it in iProjects and push it again. Yes, that seems like a
> pain, but it's up to you to honour Rule Zero at all times - RDi won't
> magically know that you've done a push and it can now safely ignore
> the iProject forever more.
>
> Well Younger Buck, the TARDIS will only allow a finite number of
> electrons to go back into our past timeline, but I hope you get the
> idea.
>
> Never violate Rule Zero. The space-time continuum depends on that.
> --Older Buck
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio
Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: [1]
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at [2]
https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
References
Visible links
1.
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
2.
https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries (WDSCI-L) mailing list To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
midrange.com
