Hi David,
Define very large copy books? How many lines?
And do they all reference other copy members?
And do they include DS or DS with arrays? Multi level DS?
I agree caching those would help.
Steve
Fortra
-----Original Message-----
From: WDSCI-L <wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of David Wright
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2025 2:13 PM
To: Rational Developer for IBM i <wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WDSCI-L] [EXTERNAL] Source parsing, for outline, performance
External: Pause and review the sender's email address, any URLs before clicking links, opening attachments, or following requests. When in doubt, contact the Service Desk.
I have mostly seen the extreme slowness in programs with very large copy books. These copy books rarely change, so if copy books could be parsed/cached locally I think it might dramatically improve performance. A copy book should only be reprocessed if it changes. A copy book cache in our case would provide system-wide benefit because every program has the same copy book I am thinking of...
---- On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 12:05:40 -0700 Greg Wilburn <gwilburn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote ---
Yes, I have... mine sometimes never finishes parsing. I experienced this in 9.6 as well.
I have also noticed that the feature that allows you to hover over a procedure to see the "comments" from the prototype source doesn't always work. I end up closing and restarting RDi.
Like others, I chalked this up to Java as well.
-----Original Message-----
From: WDSCI-L < mailto:wdsci-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > On Behalf Of David Gibbs via WDSCI-L
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2025 11:12 AM
To: Rational Developer for IBM i / Websphere Development Studio Client for System i & iSeries < mailto:wdsci-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
Cc: David Gibbs < mailto:david@xxxxxxxxxxxx >
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [WDSCI-L] Source parsing, for outline, performance
Folks:
Does anyone know why RDi 9.8 takes such a long time to parse the source to update the outline?
Frequently I've observed the 'live parsing' takes multiple minutes ...
most of the time the progress is shown as 0%.
Granted, the source I'm editing has a lot of copy members, but (according to the log) the parser is using a cached copy of the copy member.
Is anyone else seeing this behavior?
Thanks!
David
--
IBM i on Power Systems: For when you can't afford to be out of business!
I'm riding in the American Diabetes Association's Tour de Cure to raise money for diabetes research, education, advocacy, and awareness.
You can make a tax-deductible donation to my ride by visiting
https://mideml.diabetessucks.net/ .
I may have diabetes, but diabetes doesn't have me!
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: mailto:WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: mailto:WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l .
[CAUTION! This email originated outside of the organization. Please do not open attachments or click links from an unknown or suspicious origin.]
Greg Wilburn
Director of IT
301.895.3792 ext. 1231
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: mailto:WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: mailto:WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l .
--
This is the Rational Developer for IBM i (WDSCI-L) mailing list
To post a message email: WDSCI-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/wdsci-l
or email: WDSCI-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
https://archive.midrange.com/wdsci-l.
midrange.com
