RE: HTTP Server vs Apache

["Stone, Brad V (TC)" <bvstone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The standard IBM HTTP SErver (this is not the same as WAS) has no problems
that I know of.  Well, it does.  When using host headers you can't split up
the log files.  

But, everything else is fine.  I've got quite a few live sites and have no
intention of moving to Apatchy server anytime soon.  

Brad

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Hall [mailto:jhall@hillmgt.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 11:06 AM
> To: WEB400@midrange.com
> Subject: HTTP Server vs Apache
> 
> 
> We are currently using the IBM HTTP server and are 
> considering switching
> to Apache.  We use it for intranet only.  Some general info pages and
> some pages are ssl and secured by certificates.  
> 
> Any reason not to switch? Reasons to switch?
> 
> Is it faster or slower?
> 
> Any memory / DASD problems like all the posts I've been seeing on WAS?
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> John Hall
> Home Sales Co.
> +---
> | This is the WEB400 Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to WEB400@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to WEB400-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to 
> WEB400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: 
> david@midrange.com
> +---
> 
+---
| This is the WEB400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to WEB400@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to WEB400-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to WEB400-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---