|
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 09:14:26 -0500 David Gibbs <david@midrange.com> wrote: > At 08:58 AM 9/24/2001, you wrote: > >CGI has its uses, but they're not for interactive > applications. > > Joe: > > I think you'll find a large number of on-line vendors > would disagree with > that blanket statement. David is correct, and I've stated this before. most applications online are CGI, and if you break them down I'm sure you'll see a mix of Perl, PHP, Cold Fusion and ASP being the majority. There is some JSP out there, but it's not used "the way it should be". None of these other people continue to try and sway others to use their tools because they assume the other tools are inferior. They all do the job, which is outputting dynamic content to the web. They all have their strenghts, and they all have their weaknesses. Brad www.bvstools.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
