Brad Stone's **current** criticism of the PBA server's CGI performance,
based on old data, is now incorrect and misleading.  That is why
I posted what the developer said.  I did so only to set the record
straight and not to impugn Brad or anyone else.

I really like my job and try not to risk losing it by revealing inside
information.


Mel Rothman
IBM eServer Custom Technology Center (CTC), Rochester, Minnesota
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/service/ctc/



"Nathan M. Andelin" wrote:
>
> > From: "Mel Rothman" <mel@rothmanweb.com>
> > I respectfully urge you to withhold your criticism of
> > the server's CGI performance until you have had a chance
> > to evaluate the current version.
>
> Until everyone has installed the current version, Brad Stone's observations
> are useful too.
>
> Part of the problem has been speculation about IBM dropping support for the
> Original HTTP Server.  Do you have any inside information about that?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nathan M. Andelin
> www.relational-data.com


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.