Re: [WEB400] CGI Beginner

["Brad Stone" <brad@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Aaron,

It's nice to hear that our ideas are finally rubbing off on
management!  We've been preaching that for years!

But, never the time... Not until the staff is short did they
have time.  ;)  Maybe the "too many cooks" thing comes in to
play after all, even at a huge shop like yours.

Even so, the methods you describe aren't a magic bullet
either.  There is no magic bullet.  Why?  Because with any
process there is "x" amount of work.  You can't get around
that.

But, getting closer to the minimum amount (x) of work needed
can be a step in the right direction.

Brad

On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 14:15:09 -0600
 "Bartell, Aaron L. (TC)" <ALBartell@taylorcorp.com> wrote:
> >Do you think that CGI is the right architecture to
> replace green-screens?
>
> The "Pat" answer to this would be;  They both have their
> strengths and
> weaknesses.  Even though this is the Pat answer this is
> also very true.  I
> don't have enough fingers and toes to count the amount of
> times that I have
> run out of room on a green screen so I make some poor
> improvisions.  But I
> also find creating useful UI's in the browser cumbersome
> (mostly because I
> have done a lot more green screens than browser
> interfaces).
>
> I don't think that the browser is a great place to
> develop, yet.  The reason
> I say that is because I have yet to see a well written
> app for the browser.
> You also have to create your own "state" when going to
> the browser unlike a
> green screen where it is a constant state.
>
> Our company has about seven development groups, and right
> now we are working
> on creating a state-less, normalized, file-less program
> structure.  We are
> doing this because we are finding that our business is
> changing so rapidly
> that we can hardly keep up, so we need to develop
> software for re-use, and
> ease of modification.  I know people get touchy when you
> say that you want
> to take the files out of your program, but if I access my
> data by doing
> something like this. .
>
> eval    Custname = CustFile_Custname(1234)
> vs.
> FCustFile IF    K DISK
>  1234  chain CustFile
> eval    CustName = CSCSTNAM
>
> . . . I can make my programs file-less, reusable by other
> front end systems
> needing to get at my data, and modification of the
> CustFile is very
> simplified.  And I don't loose a lot of performance if
> programmed right.
>
> Aaron Bartell
>
>
>
>