Re: WebSphere on NT vs. AS/400 -- WEB400

Subject: Re: [WEB400] WebSphere on NT vs. AS/400
From: "Nathan M. Andelin" <nandelin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 07:42:40 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/web400>,<mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/web400>,<mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

> They countered same problems and tried to get an
> in-depth-look after which we were advised to load
> WebSphere on an NT-server...

Are you running Websphere on a model 720-2061?  If so, then the CPU speed is
inadequate for the workload.

This leads to a good question.  My understanding is that Java components
connect to the database and access other native resources via "host
servers".  No static binding to service programs, for example.  No shared
memory.  It's almost as if Java runs in it's own partition anyway.  What is
the difference between running Websphere on an integrated xSeries server,
and running it under OS/400?

If there is little difference, why not take advantage of the price /
performance advantage of the xSeries?

Nathan M. Andelin
www.relational-data.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Maybe if I rephrase the question? , Nathan M. Andelin

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.