|
>3) People have suggested that, if I am >just starting out, not to load 3.5 >and then migrate to 4.0 when IBM drops 3.5. >But to start out at 4.0. It has been said >that 3.5 and 4.0 are such different animals. They are quite different. That's because 3.5 was IBMs best guess at what J2EE would finally look like, while 4.0 is J2EE compliant. I do not know the particulars of 5.0 but I would be a bit surprised if there was as large a difference. I have used 3.5 and 4.0. --buck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
