|
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 12:53:01 -0600 "Nathan M. Andelin" <nandelin@RELATIONAL-DATA.COM> wrote: > > From: "Andrew Borts" > > We actually worked with the IBM folks to try and > resolve it, > > and set thread count accordingly to their suggestions - > which > > varied greatly. > > In my experience, the thread requirement is roughly 2-3 > times the number of > concurrent users. 300 users would need 600-900 available > threads, for > example. Please let us know you're experience details, because I've noticed exactly the opposite. Unless your apps are taking over a minute to be processed, the opposite should be the case.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
