Re: [WEB400] Serious speed issues...

[Anton Gombkötö <gombkoetoe@xxxxxxxxxx>]

At 14:55 08.08.2002 -0600, you wrote:
> > From: "Joel R. Cochran"
> > http://www.vamanet.com/cgi-bin/ABOUT
> > http://www.vamanet.com:1550/cgi-bin/ABOUT
>
>That's weird.  Both links generate a 185KB page, mostly blank.  They look
>fine in the browser, but a page that size takes a long time to download.

That looks really strange.

I'd understand gaps in the HTML part, then i'd guess "Net.Data", but not in
the CSS-part of the page.

What are you using to create the page, Joel? Any special logic while
creating the CSS-part?

The performance was very bad for the first request; now, after some time, i
have good times (no clock, just me measuring) here in Austria (Europe).

Excuse me adding a thing:
When you refer to the W3C, wouldn't it be a good idea to have W3C-compliant
code?
Look:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vamanet.com%2Fcgi-bin%2FABOUT&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&ss=

When you're compliant, you can proudly add another nice looking logo to
your page!
Separating the css from the page into a file of its own makes it easy to
check that for conformity, too. (antoher logo :-)

By the way: checking your page is quite a good way to measure the time. You
may divide the time by 2, as the stuff is sent to the W3C and then back to
you.

0.02 Euro


best regards /  Mit freundlichen Grüssen

Anton Gombkötö
Avenum Technologie GmbH

http://www.avenum.com