|
>> I would argue simply that it's no more difficult to target to all possible >user agents by >> following agreed upon standards, than to take advantage of browser specific >features and >> risk annoying some number of users. Well said!!!!! Netscape actually wrote a blink routine for text. What a load of dingo kidneys. It's not a bug, it's a feature! Staying compliant to the industry (rather than an implementation) insures compatibility to the widest possible platforms. Anyone who chooses to support a platform (best viewed in Netscape or whatever) risks having to re-write his/her UI every time a new thing is released. I've made a career with "keeping it simple" and with "leveraging" (corporatespeak for stealing) any good ideas I can find... It's why I monitor this mail list... *lots* of great ideas :-) dan
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
