|
> From: "Anton Gombkötö" <gombkoetoe@ASSOFT.COM> > Yes, i can imagine that this can get pretty complicated without > a "state holder" in the background. Yes, you understand! And if you're planning on using the Web equivalent to a subfile in many applications, it's helpful to have a framework with a generic "state holder" that can be shared among them. > Is Relational Web providing such functionality "out of the box" > or with functions similar to those whose simple beauty you already > showed us? Yes. However, Relational-Web evidently can't compete with products like CGIDEV2 and Net.Data, so I now only offer a license to customers who allow me to help with the development of their applications ;-) Nathan M. Andelin www.relational-data.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
