RE: [WEB400] Re: Multiple web instances assistance and comments

[Scott Mildenberger <Smildenber@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Do you have another web server instance that has grabbed that port?  Any
existing server would need to be specified to just bind to the old address.

Scott Mildenberger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve McKay [mailto:steve.mckay@southtrust.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 1:34 PM
> To: web400@midrange.com
> Subject: [WEB400] Re: Multiple web instances assistance and comments
> 
> 
> I configured an additional IP address on our current NIC 
> using CFGTCP option
> 1 and attempted to start a Apache test instance on that 
> address, port 80.
> Received the following message every 5 seconds for 5 minutes (as the
> documentation states will happen) and the test instance shut 
> itself down:
> 
>  Message ID . . . . . . :   HTP803D       Severity . . . . . 
> . . :   10
>  Message type . . . . . :   Diagnostic
>  Date sent  . . . . . . :   01/22/03      Time sent  . . . . . . :
> 14:26:56
> 
>  Message . . . . :   HTTP Server waiting for address 
> 10.10.18.54 port 80 to
>    become available.
>  Cause . . . . . :   The HTTP server is attempting to bind to address
>    10.10.18.54 on port 80, but the TCP interface or port is 
> currently not
>    available. The server is retrying the socket bind 
> operation. The error
>    number is 3420.  Error numbers and their meanings are:
>      - 3420: Port already in use
>