Eyers, Daniel wrote:
> just curious... *why* is this a consideration?  Has the RIAA and SCO
> gotten everyone nervous???
> 
> I'm really interested on the group's views
 
I think it's more common that webmasters are concerned about people saving 
the images on their web site. Again, there's no way you can prevent that. 
Even if there were a perfect way to disable the saving of images from a 
browser or the direct retrieval of the image in contexts other than 
browsing a web site, you can always grab the image using any of dozens of 
screen capture programs.

A related issue is the direct linking to of images on your site from some 
other site. It's a simple matter of .htaccess coding to restrict access to 
your images to clients with an HTTP_REFERER value indicating your site (if 
HTTP_REFERER is provided by the client).

Cheers! Hans


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.