|
midrange.com
Damn. Forgot to put "strategic" in quotes.
Mike E.
"Walden H.
Leverich III" To: "'Web Enabling the
AS400 / iSeries'" <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
<WaldenL@xxxxxxxx cc:
Inc.com> Subject: RE: [WEB400] HATS LE
replacement for WebFacing ???
Sent by:
web400-bounces@xx
drange.com
08/19/2003 11:37
AM
Please respond to
Web Enabling the
AS400 / iSeries
>Phil ... said that WebFacing is a strategic product for IBM.
Oh hell, it's screwed now. Need we review prior "strategic" products:
OS/2
San Francisco
SNA
DRDA
"Once IBM calls anything strategic, the thing is dead."
(F. Soltis, COMMON, NOLA 2001)
-Walden
------------
Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
(208) 692-3308 eFax
WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.TechSoftInc.com
Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
-----Original Message-----
From: MEovino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:MEovino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 2:34 AM
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: RE: [WEB400] HATS LE replacement for WebFacing ???
>> From: P.Goovaerts@xxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> So, is IBM dropping WebFacing in favour of HATS?
>> Does HATS has other specific features not available in WebFacing?
>> Why should one choose HATS in favour of WebFacing?
>From Joe P.
> I doubt that IBM is dropping WebFacing, Patrick.
At the Websphere Technical Exchange last month, Phil Coultard (sorry if I
botched the spelling) said that WebFacing is a strategic product for IBM.
As British bookies like to say, make of that what you will.
Another interesting insight on WebFacing. According to Phil, it was made
for ISV's to help them quickly put web front ends on their 5250 apps.
> I'm pretty sure that
> HATS is a true screen scraper, in that it requires interactive CPW.
Yep. Certainly does.
> Also, from what I understand, it's less customizable than WebFacing.
Seems like it, but I've seen some pretty interesting stuff done with it.
They describe it as "rules based."
Also, from what I've been told (I've seen some product demos -- we almost
used either WebFacing or HATS for a project), HATS LE is pretty limited. I
don't know exactly what the limits are, but they left me with the
impression that HATS LE is basically an exact representation of 5250
screens in HTML. Kinda like what WSG was supposed to have been <big ol'
grin>. Isn't HATS LE what iSeries Access for the Web uses under the covers
for 5250 emulation?
Mike E.
_______________________________________________
This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
_______________________________________________
This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
