On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 13:54:53 -0500 
 "Bartell, Aaron L. (TC)" <ALBartell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In my experiences, passing values to a CGI program (RPG
> in this case) with a
> key value pair (Name=Aaron&State=MN for example) proved
> to be less than
> adequate when you want to get a whole heap full of info
> into the RPG-CGI
> program, and then what do you respond with, more key
> value pairs, XML?

So, instead of using value pairs (using POST I would hope,
not GET) you choose to wrap each piece of data with tags,
creating at least 50% more data being transferred for the
same application?  

ie:

name=Aaron&state=mn

vs.

<xmldata>
  <name>Aaron</name>
  <state>mn</state>
</xmldata>

If you're using HTTP for the XML transfer, are you sticking
to HTTP rules as well?  Or just using it as a tranport and
ignoring the HTTP rules?

Just trying to provoke thoughts or comprehend what you're
saying here.

Just like Classic vs. Apache server.  Apache is "cooler"
and more widley used, but with Classic (Cern) you can
config your server with 3 lines, vs. the 100 or so it takes
with Apache. :)

Brad
www.bvstools.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.