So doesn't this mean that "real-time" really means up to a 3 minute
delay?  In my case, I can't afford a 3-minute delay for up to date real
time data so I don't believe this would work for me.


-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Wayne McAlpine
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 12:15 PM
To: web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [WEB400] Re: FRCA-Fast Response Cache Accelerator any benefit
while running CGI apps?

I have been using FRCA reverse proxy cache for the past year with cgi 
programs to serve election night results real-time.  I've got it set to 
cache for three mminutes, so the first call to a particular page loads 
it into the cache.  Subsequent calls during the next three minutes 
receive the cached copy.  There are literally thousands of pages cached 
in a large election and this works extremely well.

Prior to using the cache, each request did a cgi database read and buidl

of an html page, with a resulting high processor and disk usage.  We did

some stress testing originally and found a tremendous performance 
improvement using the cache, while keeping cpu usage within acceptable 
levels.  The real test will be next Tuesday night when the polls close. 
    Wish me luck!

BTW, the IE browser refresh button retrieves the cached copy.  Mozilla, 
however, forces a reload.  Fortunately, about 98% of our clients are IE,

so it works fine.



Mike Skvarenina wrote:
> My apologies for the continuous questions but now that I'm running
Apache, I
> feel like a kid in a candy store and am looking to maximize my CGI
> performance.  The documentation is useful but end user experience is
almost
> always much more informative.
> 
> This question is about the FRCA.  My CGI apps are basically RPG
database
> intensive programs that don't make much use of the IFS.  About the
only IFS
> references I use is for the graphics (icons and pictures) I store on
the IFS
> so my CGI apps can reference them.
> 
> In this case, does using FRCA add any benefit?
> 
> 
> Also, I see there are options to specify the min and max number of CGI
jobs.
> The default is 40.  I cannot find any documentation on recommended
values
> based on my system size.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
> To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
> or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.