|
In our case we wanted to webface a menu system. The deployment issue would be if we webfaced the entire menu system as one project it would be a very large EAR deployed and the entire system (EAR) would have to brought down to install updates. If we did each menu option as it's own project it would be many EAR files but have the ability to take down one option to install an update. This leads to the parameter issue because I would be going between different webfacing projects and lose "state". The profile issue is that a webfacing request wants the requesting profile to say limit capabilities *YES and initial program QQINVOKER. This doesn't work for a power user like a programmer. They are limit capabilities *NO. Also, we have different initial programs or routing data to get to a different subsystem for 5250 sessions. There is a slight workaround in that you can determine the request to be web facing or 5250 but if webfacing is the first request it locks the message queue and when you log on to a 5250 session you do not get your messages because the webfacing project locked it. Hope this helps! -----Original Message----- From: Dupuis Vincent [mailto:vdupuis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 3:56 AM To: web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [WEB400] Who Uses WebSphere Express? Hello, We will soon deploy a WebFaced application generated with WDSC 5.2.1.4 on a WAS Express 5.1. Let me know why profiles and deployment can be an issue please. Vincent ------------------------------------------------------- date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:31:09 -0400 from: "Gibbons, Michael" <bmis04@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> subject: RE: [WEB400] Who Uses WebSphere Express? Hello, We are using WAS Express in production for quite a while now. We at version 5.2 now. WAS express works just fine. We are using custom built serlets in conjunction with the ISeries java toolbox. The only downside is you can not take full advantage of webfacing. You need the full version for single signon environment (very complex if you try ldap), command key and parameter processing is easier, and there is an issue with profiles. Deployment of webfacing projects can be an issue also. But, to do both dynamic and non-dynamic pages using servlets and jsp it works fine. Hope this helps -----Original Message----- From: Joe Pluta [mailto:joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 7:06 PM To: 'Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries' Subject: [WEB400] Who Uses WebSphere Express? I'm going to cross-post this to MIDRANGE-L as well, because I think it is a valid question for that list, as it's an overall technical question. But David will let us know one way or the other. The situation is this. On one of the iSeries forums, a contention has been made that WebSphere Express is inadequate for use as a corporate web application server. I vehemently denied this, since I use it and I know of several clients using it to some degree. But many of my clients are in the pre-production stage, or else are using the full WebSphere product, and so I'm not a good source of information for this. Further, someone implied that IBM has no idea how many people are actually using the product, so that asking them would not help. Again I disagreed, and I will try to ask some folks within IBM. However, I thought it might also be appropriate to go to the horse's mouth, so to speak, and ask the vast community that makes up midrange.com and see what they are doing. So, I was wondering how many of you are currently using WebSphere Express on an iSeries in production. While I realize that some may not be able to say much due to corporate privacy issues, any additional information would be welcome, such as number of users, intranet vs. Internet, type of applications and so on. I plan to gather this information and include it in an upcoming article, so if you'd like to give some information but not have it publicly available, feel free to email me directly and state that it's not for the record. Thanks in advance, everyone! I think it's time we start getting some real information out there and fight the FUD that's I feel is going to happen very shortly as vendors begin to position themselves to get the greatest piece of the iSeries pie. If you're interested in reading why I feel that way, please see my just-published article, "The iSeries: The Once and Future King" at MCPressOnline: http://www.mcpressonline.com/mc?1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@.6b2216b3 Joe -- This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400 or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/web400. -- This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400 or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
