|
Matt, Yeah, I checked that earlier, the non-DB page rate is just over 100. Right now the partition is only getting about 768MB of memory and it does not have a full processor allocated. I personally think beefing up this partition will make things better. I am looking for opinions like yours to help me plead my case. However, our remote locations all have terrible PC's in place, Pentium 2's and 3's running Win98. I think this is another big part of the problem. But I don't think a (mostly) Windows guy like me is going to sell the thought of buying new pc's to the rest of the gang in my 400 shop. The PC's have caused all sorts of grief, especially printing. Even though the download for IBM's AFP viewer says that it supports Win98, believe me it does not. I switched over to TIFF for printing, works great on one 98 machine, but then on the other machine I have to save files to hard drive before viewing the TIFF's, otherwise I get an invalid document name when it tries to open it. Right now I am having our folks jump through hoops to get their reports printing. PDF should work, but I get errors because some java classes are missing, it looks like it is looking for classes on the 400 that I am pointing them to, but this 400 is not even running iSeries for Web, which I assume is why the PDF server could not start. Then again, PDF's might turn out to be slower on PC's that I am dealing with........... Dave Reiher System Analyst Prairie Farms Dairy - Corporate Ph: 217.854.2547 ext. 254 dreiher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "Haas, Matt" <Matt.Haas@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 08/24/2005 09:10 AM Please respond to Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To "Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries" <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject RE: [WEB400] WAS 5.1 Express Performance Dave, Did you allocate a full processor to this partition? If not, Java performance will suffer. How much memory did you allocation? Simple apps need at least 1 GB for decent performance. Watch the non-DB page rate on WRKSYSSTS. IBM says keep it under 100 for best performance. Is performance okay locally? If it's remote people having problems, it may just be limitations of the connection they are using or network configuration issues. Matt -----Original Message----- From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dave Reiher/prairiefarms Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 9:59 AM To: web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [WEB400] WAS 5.1 Express Performance Anyone have any thoughts or know of any good resources on fine tuning WAS 5.1 Express Application server performance? I am running iSeries for Web on a small partition here, in my config for iSeries for Web I am redirecting to another AS400 off site. It just seems to run a little bit slow for our folks in the field. Is there anything I can do to fine tune the performance? Would throwing more resources at my partition do any good? The performance doesn't seem to take a hit on the 400 partition except when starting or stopping an instance. I hate buy more memory or allocate more only to infd out it doesn't do me any good. Any thoughts?? Dave Reiher System Analyst Prairie Farms Dairy - Corporate Ph: 217.854.2547 ext. 254 dreiher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.