Re: WebFacing (2 applications 1 HTTP Server) -- WEB400

Subject: Re: WebFacing (2 applications 1 HTTP Server)
From: Dave Reiher/prairiefarms <DReiher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 15:44:24 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Same HTTP and WAS servers....

    Dave Reiher
    System Analyst
    Prairie Farms Dairy - Corporate
    dreiher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



Dave Reiher/prairiefarms <DReiher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
12/05/2005 03:40 PM
Please respond to
Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
[WEB400] WebFacing (2 applications 1 HTTP Server)






Is this not recommended?
I have a couple of WebFaced applications, and it would sure be easiest to 
just run them on the same HTTP server.
I thought I might have read some where this was not recommended, anyone??


    Dave Reiher
    System Analyst
    Prairie Farms Dairy - Corporate
   dreiher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.