Aaron B. wrote: So I am wondering how many servers they have
running all of those sites?

They said they were running about 3,000 servers. At first they tried scaling
vertically, using 16-way servers, but when that didn't work, they went with
horizontal scaling. The database server was a constraint, so they partitioned
the database across 60 DB servers.

The biggest constraint now appears to be the time it takes to maintain
applications across thousands of servers.

What I more want to know, and am guessing nobody here can really
answer, is how much work (hardware, software, etc) is required to do >this
with M$ vs. IBM?

Good question. The i5 would scale better vertically, up to 64-way servers, but
at some point you'd need an architecture that scaled horizontally.

Interesting the MySpace.com guy said that he can't imagine doing
this on any other platform than Microsoft ...

He also said they pulled their hair out every night.

Nathan.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.